Skip to main content

Health

Health is such a complicated subject. And now a days a very commercial one. So many health products, supplements, diets, juices, super-foods are readily available. Each one promises to be the best thing ever. Take diets for example. Think of any food category and there is probably a diet centered around it. Heck, there is even a 30 bananas a day diet. Yes, you eat nothing but bananas. And I guess it might make you go bananas in the process but I have not tried it so I can't really comment.  See thisthis and this. But what I am concerned about is the extremes in all these diets. And there is "evidence" which supports their claim and they always have hordes of people who have basically turned from whales to supermodels with these diets. The paleo diet to some extent and some other meat based diets on the one hand are all about meat (and how our ancestors ate), while you also see the exact opposite with a vegan diet or a raw food diet. And there is the new in-thing to avoid - Gluten - the source of all evils. And I am (even currently) one of those who believe gluten to be the source of a lot of issues. (I myself have not reached a conclusion, but I know for sure that there are some foods that do not go well with my system resulting in inflammation - but I can't really seem to figure out exactly what foods. Bread seems to be one of them - so things that are baked. However I seem to be find with things made out of wheat flour which are not baked, perhaps it is the yeast in the bread that I am sensitive to.). I think the human body is very variable in this sense and what works for one might not work for another in terms of diet. The Masai people in Kenya and Tanzania are known to sustain only on meat and milk leading long healthy lives. On the other hand we have vegans, monks etc. who eat nothing but vegatables. And there are cases in both groups of extremely healthy people and extremely sick people. So maybe there is no one diet that is the miracle diet for all. Each one of us has a different set of genetics (unique infact), different digestive abilities, different food sensitivities. I guess we just have to find what our body really agrees with and stick to that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should one be thankful since the “probability” that one exists is so low ?

  Should one be thankful since the “probability” that one exists is so low ? Not really - thinking of probability in these terms is meaningless when we don’t understand a lot of things - eg consciousness, qualia, creativity etc. It’s like buying a KitKat and asking what is the probability that this exact KitKat is in my hand right now out of the billions that have been manufactured and why KitKat and not katkit (ie why did they name it KitKat) etc. Such probabilities are meaningless. I understand where this line of thinking comes from - wanting people to appreciate life more given how “improbable” it is that we are here. But that’s not the reason to appreciate life in my opinion and this kind of reasoning - first of all is not useful and secondly doesn’t have much meaning as I said. There are reasons to appreciate life of course even though we don’t understand a lot of them yet (since philosophy, including moral philosophy hasn’t ma...

Old movies are better?

 Someone said some time back "I love older movies, they are so much better. They don't make movies like that anymore - older movies are so much better". I promptly pointed out this reasoning is mistaken. The fact is that there are a LOT more older movies than newer movies. Like a lot lot more. If you classify newer movies as movies released in the last 5 years, there are like perhaps a 100 times more movies made from the dawn of cinema till 5 years ago. So even if say only 5% of older movies are good as compared to 10% of newer movies (which is the other side of the preposition) even then there would be 50 times more "good" older movies then newer movies.