Skip to main content

Anxiety and memory

 How does the brain decide if something is important enough to remember? i.e. something is important enough to be saved into long term memory. The mechanism the brain uses is that of feelings - if something makes us feel an emotion - and the stronger the emotion - the more likely and strongly the memory is saved. And it is disproportionately biased towards fear/anxiety - so events that come with fear/anxiety are more favorably saved into long term memory (and sometimes the process itself can get stuck and cause PTSD). The reasons for this are obvious - evolutionarily speaking anything that could jeopardize the survival of the organism is the most critical to remember for the future. 

It doesn't matter how impactful the actual event is, if you don't feel anything much the brain is not going to save it. So if you see a tiger and you don't have any corresponding feeling after seeing the tiger, you will not remember it. 

I personally struggled with anxiety for a long time, and I now realize my memory during that time was quite sharp. I would remember the most mundane of details and interactions. This was due to my baseline anxiety being high, and hence the system that saves stuff into long term memory being constantly activated. Now my anxiety is generally quite low, and as a side effect of that I find my memory is rather poor! How interesting - I can have a good memory but I need to accept a higher level of general anxiety with it.

Personally, I am happy with the lower anxiety and poor memory.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should one be thankful since the “probability” that one exists is so low ?

  Should one be thankful since the “probability” that one exists is so low ? Not really - thinking of probability in these terms is meaningless when we don’t understand a lot of things - eg consciousness, qualia, creativity etc. It’s like buying a KitKat and asking what is the probability that this exact KitKat is in my hand right now out of the billions that have been manufactured and why KitKat and not katkit (ie why did they name it KitKat) etc. Such probabilities are meaningless. I understand where this line of thinking comes from - wanting people to appreciate life more given how “improbable” it is that we are here. But that’s not the reason to appreciate life in my opinion and this kind of reasoning - first of all is not useful and secondly doesn’t have much meaning as I said. There are reasons to appreciate life of course even though we don’t understand a lot of them yet (since philosophy, including moral philosophy hasn’t ma...
Post a Comment
Read more

Old movies are better?

 Someone said some time back "I love older movies, they are so much better. They don't make movies like that anymore - older movies are so much better". I promptly pointed out this reasoning is mistaken. The fact is that there are a LOT more older movies than newer movies. Like a lot lot more. If you classify newer movies as movies released in the last 5 years, there are like perhaps a 100 times more movies made from the dawn of cinema till 5 years ago. So even if say only 5% of older movies are good as compared to 10% of newer movies (which is the other side of the preposition) even then there would be 50 times more "good" older movies then newer movies. 
Post a Comment
Read more