Skip to main content

Subjective experience of objective beauty

 I believe there is objective beauty, like there is objective morality. David Deustch makes a case of this in this book 'The beginning of Infinity'. Or you can watch this - Why are flowers beautiful

Now there is objective beauty and subjective beauty. Subjective beauty is not necessarily objective - there are evolutionary/cultural ideas that make us find certain things attractive in order to get us to act in certain ways. And these things are not necessarily objectively beautiful. 

I have wondered - is there a subjective difference between one's enjoyment of objective beauty and subjective beauty. i.e. do we feel different when we are experiencing something that is objectively beautiful vs something that is just subjectively beautiful? 

only a theory of beauty and aesthetics can answer that and we don't have one yet


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should one be thankful since the “probability” that one exists is so low ?

  Should one be thankful since the “probability” that one exists is so low ? Not really - thinking of probability in these terms is meaningless when we don’t understand a lot of things - eg consciousness, qualia, creativity etc. It’s like buying a KitKat and asking what is the probability that this exact KitKat is in my hand right now out of the billions that have been manufactured and why KitKat and not katkit (ie why did they name it KitKat) etc. Such probabilities are meaningless. I understand where this line of thinking comes from - wanting people to appreciate life more given how “improbable” it is that we are here. But that’s not the reason to appreciate life in my opinion and this kind of reasoning - first of all is not useful and secondly doesn’t have much meaning as I said. There are reasons to appreciate life of course even though we don’t understand a lot of them yet (since philosophy, including moral philosophy hasn’t ma...
Post a Comment
Read more

Old movies are better?

 Someone said some time back "I love older movies, they are so much better. They don't make movies like that anymore - older movies are so much better". I promptly pointed out this reasoning is mistaken. The fact is that there are a LOT more older movies than newer movies. Like a lot lot more. If you classify newer movies as movies released in the last 5 years, there are like perhaps a 100 times more movies made from the dawn of cinema till 5 years ago. So even if say only 5% of older movies are good as compared to 10% of newer movies (which is the other side of the preposition) even then there would be 50 times more "good" older movies then newer movies. 
Post a Comment
Read more