Skip to main content

All life is problem solving

 What is happiness? Popper answered this question the best in his answer to what is the meaning of life.

"All life is problem solving"

Problem in the Popperian sense is not always something bad. Problem can be any unsolved thing that you are working on and the definition is not limited to science, art etc. Raising your kids well is also a problem in this sense, and so is trying to get better at dodgeball. Working on a problem is a process of knowledge creation.

So in a sense, life is a process of knowledge creation. What is a good life then? what is a happy life?

It is a life where the problems you are working on, the knowledge that you are creating, are interesting to YOU. This is the key here - YOU find these problems interesting and are free of coercion in choosing these problems. This is easier said than done. I wrote about it in an earlier blog post, but I believe most misery (excluding misery due to physical pain/limitations, or psychological issues that are real e.g. being diagnosed with a terminal illness etc.) is due to coercion. 

And this coercion is insidious since almost everything out there is trying to coerce you - your genes are trying to coerce you into their own evolutionary agenda, society and culture, and your own wrong ideas are coercing you. It is difficult, but not impossible, to escape the assaults of coercion from all directions. Your genes want you to chase wealth, status, sex. Your culture wants you to marry, obey parents, pray, buy a house, have children and raise them a specific way etc. All these ideas are competing for your attention and action. And most people spend their lives acting on them. However, beneath all these there is a true pure INTEREST or several INTERSTS which are true to the individual without any coercive forces. Happiness is trying to take away the layers of coercion and working on these pure interests. Solving the problems therein. 

So no matter how much money, security, prestige the things you are working on generate for you and no matter how noble, moral or important you think they are - if you are not genuinely interested in them you cannot be happy. 

And like Popper said should it so happen that you actually reach the pinnacle or solve the problem you are working on, that is not the sad end - there always are several little problem children for you to work on. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should one be thankful since the “probability” that one exists is so low ?

  Should one be thankful since the “probability” that one exists is so low ? Not really - thinking of probability in these terms is meaningless when we don’t understand a lot of things - eg consciousness, qualia, creativity etc. It’s like buying a KitKat and asking what is the probability that this exact KitKat is in my hand right now out of the billions that have been manufactured and why KitKat and not katkit (ie why did they name it KitKat) etc. Such probabilities are meaningless. I understand where this line of thinking comes from - wanting people to appreciate life more given how “improbable” it is that we are here. But that’s not the reason to appreciate life in my opinion and this kind of reasoning - first of all is not useful and secondly doesn’t have much meaning as I said. There are reasons to appreciate life of course even though we don’t understand a lot of them yet (since philosophy, including moral philosophy hasn’t ma...
Post a Comment
Read more

Old movies are better?

 Someone said some time back "I love older movies, they are so much better. They don't make movies like that anymore - older movies are so much better". I promptly pointed out this reasoning is mistaken. The fact is that there are a LOT more older movies than newer movies. Like a lot lot more. If you classify newer movies as movies released in the last 5 years, there are like perhaps a 100 times more movies made from the dawn of cinema till 5 years ago. So even if say only 5% of older movies are good as compared to 10% of newer movies (which is the other side of the preposition) even then there would be 50 times more "good" older movies then newer movies. 
Post a Comment
Read more